The Canucks figure to get younger and probably bigger, the
gameplan seems to be to surround their core with those type of players that will hopefully be able to go against the
bigger teams like LA, STL, SJ etc. This seems like a realistic path forward,
however the thing that interests me is whether the Canucks will also change
their player deployment. Mike Gillis did not talk about this at all nor was he
ever questioned about it, however if you take a look at the teams Gillis was
reffering to they all feature their top players drawing the toughest
assignments all over the ice, often getting power-vs-power matchups equally in
the defensive as well as offensive zone. The Canucks are actually a polar opposite
of this with their role specialization (more on this here). Although that
really can be argued is a coaching issue, and Gillis did say coaching will be
evaluated like everything else.
So what should be the next step for the Canucks? As Gillis
said, a bigger, tougher to play against look is in store, but it should be
important not to forget about the fact that most of the teams that had success
in the last few years also favor a more complete role for their top forwards
than the Canucks do, the big question is how would the Sedins perform in such
matchups not only in the offensive zone but the defensive zone (and possibly
PK) as well, and it is something that Canucks should explore as they in Gillis'
words hit the reset button. If it turns out the Sedins just can't handle that
type of complete role bigger changes might be in store than just surrounding
them with bigger, tougher support
players.
No comments:
Post a Comment